畢業(yè)論文格式

  編號(hào)          

  

 

 

      課題名稱                                       

 

 

    學(xué)生姓名            

    學(xué)    號(hào)            

　　專    業(yè)            

　　班    級(jí)            

　　指導(dǎo)教師            

 

 　　2004 年    月

 

I. Introduction

II. Demonstration

A. Language as a concrete system of signs, has its own significance in the context of society.

1. Language is a system.

2.The conventionalization of language.

B. Language as a social institution, is born with society. It develops and interacts  with the society.

1. Communicative function of language.

2. Language evolves hand in hand with the society.

  a.Influences from the society upon language.

  1)   Macrolinguistic perceptive

  2) Microlinguistic perceptive

  b.Influences from language upon society

   1) Interaction between language and society

   2) Social factors and linguistic research

III. Conclusion

This paper begins with a brief introduction to Chomsky’s methodology of idealization in linguistic research. Although the idealization in physical research from which Chomsky’s idealization deprives can still keep natural laws’ validity, the author points out Chomsky’s idealization is not accessible. The key point lies in the exclusion of social factors in his research. Then the author demonstrates the reason why Chomsky’s exclusion of social factors is not accessible from two aspects: (1) Language is a concrete system of signs. (2)Language is a social institution. Only in the context of society are these features significant and integrate, can language bear its form and forward its development and keep up the interaction with the society. Therefore instead of  “being idealized” out of linguistic research, social factors should be regarded as the base of the research. Otherwise the object of the research will be totally changed and the research itself will be misguided. As for what factors can be temporarily idealized without changing language’s fundamental features? This is a question worth our further study in the future.

摘要：本文從Chomsky在語(yǔ)言學(xué)研究過(guò)程中所采用的理想化模式入手，認(rèn)為Chomsky為了使研究變得簡(jiǎn)單，便將與語(yǔ)言關(guān)系緊密的社會(huì)因素摒除在研究范圍之外，這是一種不可取的理想模式。接下來(lái)本文從兩個(gè)主要方面闡述了理想化模式不可取的原因：一是語(yǔ)言作為一種符號(hào)系統(tǒng)，只有在社會(huì)的環(huán)境下才能具有完整的意義。二是語(yǔ)言作為一種社會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)，無(wú)論是它的產(chǎn)生還是發(fā)展過(guò)程，都在不斷地和社會(huì)發(fā)生著相互作用。故而只要是研究語(yǔ)言學(xué)，我們就不能將社會(huì)因素“理想化”。至于什么因素可以暫時(shí)不予考慮，這仍有待進(jìn)一步的研究。 

關(guān)鍵詞： 理想化，符號(hào)系統(tǒng)，社會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)，語(yǔ)言與社會(huì)的相互作用